VORANOXINC.
Illustrative engagement← All sketches

Voranox Sterling · Banking & Financial Services

Continuous credit revaluation across a $1.4 trillion balance sheet, replacing a quarterly batch process inherited from the 2010s.

Counterpart

Global Systemically Important Bank · top-10 by assets

Region

North America · EMEA · APAC

Engagement duration

11 months from briefing to production

Challenge

What the institution brought to the first briefing.

The institution's credit risk function was running counterparty PD, LGD, and EAD on a quarterly batch cycle, with intra-quarter recalibration only on named-watchlist names. By the time exposures revalued, several macro and idiosyncratic signals had moved meaningfully — and the bank's regulator was beginning to ask why.

The internal team had built three prior attempts at continuous revaluation across the last decade. Each failed for the same reason: the model was not auditable to the standard the appointed actuary or the regulator required, and the bank's risk committee was unwilling to govern a system whose decisions could not be reproduced.

Approach

The Voranox engagement model in practice.

Voranox Sterling was deployed under a six-month Discovery and Scoping phase against the bank's existing credit data warehouse, with no production data leaving the bank's sovereign cloud. The Engagement Memorandum was negotiated by the bank's general counsel and the firm's general counsel and signed by the bank's Chief Risk Officer and the firm's Managing Partner.

The deployment was conducted by joint working groups of the bank's credit-risk engineers and Voranox engineers, operating against the bank's own standards of audit, change management, and model governance.

The same six-stage process governs every engagement — see how engagements proceed.

Architecture

How the platform deployed.

Sterling deployed entirely within the bank's sovereign cloud topology — no Voranox-operated infrastructure carries customer data. The platform integrates with the bank's existing credit data warehouse, market-data feed, and macro-signal ingestion via the bank's own service mesh.

Every PD recalculation produces a tamper-evident audit record carrying the model artifact hash, the input data hash, the policy in force, and the resulting figure. The bank's internal audit can replay any decision at any historical point with cryptographic certainty.

For the firm’s standing architectural posture, see architecture and trust & standards.

Outcome

What changed in the institution.

Revaluation cadence

Quarterly → Continuous

Counterparties revalued

240,000+ · live

Model-decision audit latency

<2 sec / replay

Capital model uplift

Within Pillar 2 tolerance

The bank's risk committee accepted the model into governance at the second review. The regulator's standing question on intra-quarter revaluation was withdrawn. The Voranox engagement has since extended into the wholesale-banking advisory and trading-desk surveillance modules.

For your own engagement of this shape.

Request a Confidential Briefing